Advertisement
Original Articles|Articles in Press

Material Properties of Suture Augmentation of Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Repair Did Not Influence Length Changes or Failure Loads in a Caged Porcine Model

Open AccessPublished:April 08, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.03.002

      Purpose

      To investigate whether the biomechanical properties of the healed superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) repaired by augmentation vary depending on the material properties of the suture augmentation.

      Methods

      In 8 of 10 porcines (16 hindlimbs), the sMCL was detached from the femoral attachment using a scalpel under intubated general anesthesia. sMCL repair was performed using an ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tape for the right hindlimbs and polyester tape (PE) for the left hindlimbs. They were sacrificed at 4 weeks postoperatively. The remaining 2 animals were assigned to the native control group (left and right hindlimb; n = 4). All connective tissues and suture augmentation, except for the repaired sMCL, were removed, and their biomechanical properties were evaluated.

      Results

      No significant differences were observed in the upper yield load (PE group, 247.4 ± 116.0 N; UHMWPE group, 279.9 ± 95.7 N; and sham group, 231.6 ± 50.6 N; P = .70), maximum yield load (PE group, 310.1 ± 166.1 N; UHMWPE group, 334.6 ± 95.2 N; and sham group, 290.9 ± 42.3 N; P = .84), linear stiffness (PE group, 43.3 ± 16.5 N/mm; UHMWPE group, 52.0 ± 28.2 N/mm; and sham group, 44.7 ± 7.2 N/mm; P = .66), and elongation at failure (PE group, 9.4 ± 4.3 mm; UHMWPE group, 9.1 ± 2.7 mm; and sham group, 10.1 ± 2.1 mm; P = .89). Statistical analysis of failure modes showed no significant difference between the groups (P = .21).

      Conclusions

      The material properties of suture augmentation used for sMCL repair did not significantly influence length changes during cyclic loading, postoperative structural properties, or failure modes.

      Clinical Relevance

      The results of this study provide valuable information regarding the efficacy of suture augmentation repair regardless of the materials used.
      Superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) injuries are common
      • Reider B.
      • Sathy M.R.
      • Talkington J.
      • Blyznak N.
      • Kollias S.
      Treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament injuries in athletes with early functional rehabilitation. A five-year follow-up study.
      and demonstrate a high degree of self-healing even in grade 3 injuries.
      • Indelicato P.A.
      Non-operative treatment of complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee.
      Many patients with sMCL injuries recover with nonoperative treatment.
      • Bollen S.
      Epidemiology of knee injuries: Diagnosis and triage.
      However, nonoperative treatment fails in approximately 80% of grade 3 sMCL injuries,
      • Fetto J.F.
      • Marshall J.L.
      Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee: A rationale for treatment.
      with persistent valgus and rotational instability.
      • Stannard J.P.
      • Black B.S.
      • Azbell C.
      • Volgas D.A.
      Posteromedial corner injury in knee dislocations.
      Especially in cases with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, stabilization of the MCL by surgical treatment is expected to reduce stress on the ACL
      • Mehl J.T.
      • Kia C.
      • Murphy M.
      • et al.
      Posteromedial ligament repair of the knee with suture tape augmentation: A biomechanical study.
      and prevent failure after the reconstruction of ACL. In the acute setting, anatomic repair of sMCL injuries was reported to improve stability and functional scores with low complication rates.
      • DeLong J.M.
      • Waterman B.R.
      Surgical repair of medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner injuries of the knee: A systematic review.
      This surgical approach combines anatomic repair with suture augmentation, providing a superior biomechanical environment that allows early rehabilitation.
      • Mehl J.T.
      • Kia C.
      • Murphy M.
      • et al.
      Posteromedial ligament repair of the knee with suture tape augmentation: A biomechanical study.
      ,
      • Gilmer B.B.
      • Crall T.
      • DeLong J.
      • Kubo T.
      • Mackay G.
      • Jani S.S.
      Biomechanical analysis of internal bracing for treatment of medial knee injuries.
      On the contrary, suture anchor repair with augmentation using polyester (PE) tape did not improve the biomechanical properties of the sMCL repaired compared with the intact state in a large animal model.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      Recently, a new type of suture tape made of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), which is biocompatible, has been developed.
      • Lubowitz J.H.
      • MacKay G.
      • Gilmer B.
      Knee medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner anatomic repair with internal bracing.
      • Lee P.Y.F.
      • Golding D.
      • Rozewicz S.
      • Chandratreya A.
      Modern synthetic material is a safe and effective alternative for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
      • Mackenzie C.E.A.
      • Huntington L.S.
      • Tulloch S.
      Suture tape augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases biomechanical stability: A scoping review of biomechanical, animal, and clinical studies.
      The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the biomechanical properties of the healed sMCL repaired by augmentation varied depending on the material properties of the suture augmentation. We hypothesized that the biomechanical properties of the healed sMCL repaired by augmentation would vary depending on the material properties of the suture augmentation used.

      Methods

      Study Design

      In total, ten 3-month-old female pigs (mean weight 38.3 ± 2.0 kg, range 35.1-41.4 kg) were purchased from Sun-S Breeding (Funabashi, Japan). All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the regulations of the Institution’s Animal Welfare and Use Committee (approval no. 21014-01). Of the 10 pigs, 8 were assigned to the sMCL augmentation repair group: (1) anatomic repair with 2 simple nylon sutures and UHMWPE tape augmentation (right hindlimbs, n = 8) and (2) anatomic repair with 2 simple nylon sutures and PE tape augmentation (left hindlimbs, n = 8). The remaining 2 animals were assigned to the native control group (left and right hindlimbs; n = 4).

      Anatomic repair followed by UHMWPE tape augmentation

      Under intubated general anesthesia and aseptic conditions, a right knee medial longitudinal skin incision was made (Fig 1A ), and the sMCL was completely detached at the femoral attachment using a No. 15 scalpel to create an avulsion injury (Fig 1B).
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      ,
      • Takahashi T.
      • Takeshita K.
      In vivo biomechanical evaluations of suture anchors for repairing grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament injury in a porcine model.
      sMCL repair was performed using 2.0 nylon thread (Fig 1C) intended only to reduce the detached sMCL to its anatomic position, followed by UHMWPE tape augmentation by loading suture augmentation (ULTRATAPE; Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA) and 2 interference screws (Cannu-Flex SILK; Smith & Nephew Endoscopy). The initial tension of 30 N was applied to the suture augmentation, and sutures from the femoral sMCL anchor were secured to the anatomic tibial insertion of the MCL (Fig 2).
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      The incisions were closed sequentially from the deep fascia of the vastus medialis muscle. The dressing material was removed within 48 hours postoperatively.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Fig 1Detachment and immediate repair of sMCL. (A) The sMCL was exposed through a longitudinal skin incision. (B) The sMCL was detached at the femoral attachment. (C) sMCL repair using 2.0 nylon thread. (sMCL, superficial medial collateral ligament.)
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Fig 2UHMWPE tape augmentation. UHMWPE tape augmentation was performed by loading UHMWPE tape and 2 interference screws for both femur and tibia. (UHMWPE, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene.)

      Anatomic Repair Followed by PE Tape Augmentation

      The procedure was similar to that in anatomic repair with augmentation, except for the materials of the suture augmentation used. After the anatomic repair, another PE tape (Neoligament; Xilos, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK) and 2 interference screws were added to each anchor of the femoral sMCL footprint for PE tape augmentation (Fig 3).
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Fig 3PE tape augmentation. PE tape augmentation was performed by loading PE tape and two interference screws for both femur and tibia. (PE, polyester tape.)

      Postoperative Management

      After the surgery, the animals were returned to their cages (2 × 3 × 2 m) so that they could apply sufficient weight to their limbs without limitation of limb movements. To monitor the protective limbs and pus discharge, each animal was observed once or twice a week. All animals survived during the follow-up period. They were euthanized at 4 weeks postoperatively, following reports that the sMCL had acquired mechanical characteristics equivalent to those of the original sMCL 4 weeks after repair with anchors.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      ,
      • Takahashi T.
      • Takeshita K.
      In vivo biomechanical evaluations of suture anchors for repairing grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament injury in a porcine model.
      Native control animals were also euthanized at the same monthly age. Knee specimens were retrieved immediately after euthanasia. All connective ligaments and capsules around the knee joint were removed, except for the repaired or native sMCL. All right and left femur–sMCL–tibia (FMT) complexes were potted in aluminum tubes.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      ,
      • Takahashi T.
      • Takeshita K.
      In vivo biomechanical evaluations of suture anchors for repairing grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament injury in a porcine model.
      The suture tapes were carefully removed, and no severe adhesions between the suture tapes and the repaired sMCLs were observed during the removal of either UHMWPE or PE that would damage the repaired sMCLs.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.

      Biomechanical Testing of the FMT Complex

      During the experiment, the structures were kept moist with saline solution. The prepared FMT composite specimens were mounted on a tensile testing machine (Tensilon RTG 1250; Orientec Co., Tokyo, Japan) with specially designed grips. Before the testing, a static preload of 5 N was applied to the specimen for 30 seconds, followed by 20 cycles of 0 to 40 N loading at a crosshead speed of 100 mm/min. The increase in construction length was recorded. Then, each specimen was stretched to failure while preconditioning at a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min, and a tensile load was applied parallel to the long axis of the repaired or native sMCL (Fig 4). These conditions have been frequently used for measurements in previous studies using large animal models.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      ,
      • Takahashi T.
      • Takeshita K.
      In vivo biomechanical evaluations of suture anchors for repairing grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament injury in a porcine model.
      ,
      • Kubo T.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Biomechanical comparisons of anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture fixation using high-strength suture and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene suture tape in a porcine model.
      Load–extension curves were obtained using dedicated software (Tensilon Advanced Controller for Testing; Orientec Co.). The structural properties of the FMT composites (upper yield load, maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) were calculated using software.
      Figure thumbnail gr4
      Fig 4Biomechanical evaluation of the prepared femur–medial collateral ligament–tibia (FMT) complex. The FMT complex specimen was mounted on a tensile tester with a set of specially designed grips. A tensile load was applied to the medial collateral ligament in parallel with its long axis. Cyclic testing was performed first, followed by tensile testing.

      Histologic Evaluation

      Immediately after the biomechanical examination, the femoral and tibial sides of the ruptured FMT complex were harvested from the knee, fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution (pH = 7.4) at 4°C for 24 hours, and demineralized with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 7 days. After embedding in paraffin, 4 μm-thick longitudinal sections were cut in the sagittal plane along the long axis of the graft. Each section was mounted on a glass slide coated with 0.01% poly-L-lysine. The sections were then dried overnight at 37°C and degreased with xylene. The sections were rehydrated with distilled water, immersed in phosphate-buffered saline (pH = 7.4), stained with hematoxylin and eosin and toluidine blue, and observed histomorphometrically. These sections were evaluated by light microscopy (BIOREVO BZ-9000; KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan).

      Statistical Analysis

      A priori power analysis was performed using G∗ Power 3.1 (Franz Paul, Kiel, Germany).
      • Faul F.
      • Erdfelder E.
      • Lang A.G.
      • Buchner A.G.
      ∗Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
      The sample size was calculated with 79% power and a Cohen’s effect size of 0.8 to test the study hypothesis. Among the 3 groups, one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the groups. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. A Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate the difference in failure modes between the groups. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR.
      • Kanda Y.
      Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics.
      P values of <.05 were considered significant.

      Results

      Length Change During Cyclic Loading

      No significant differences were observed in the length change during the cyclic testing (PE group, 1.72 ± 1.60 mm; UHMWPE group, 0.86 ± 0.75 mm; and sham group, 0.74 ± 0.30 mm; P = .27) (Table 1).
      Table 1Biomechanical Properties
      ParametersPE (n = 8)UHMWPE (n = 8)Sham (n = 4)P Value
      Length change, mm1.72 (1.60)0.86 (0.75)0.74 (0.30).27
      Upper yield load, N247.4 (116.0)279.9 (95.7)231.6 (50.6).70
      Maximum yield load, N310.1 (166.1)334.6 (95.2)290.9 (42.3).84
      Linear stiffness, N/mm43.3 (16.5)52.0 (28.2)44.7 (7.2).66
      Elongation at failure, mm9.4 (4.3)9.1 (2.7)10.1 (2.1).89
      NOTE. Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation).
      PE, polyester tape; UHMPE, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene.

      Biomechanical Evaluations of the FMT Complex

      No significant differences were observed in the upper yield load (PE group, 247.4 ± 116.0 N; UHMWPE group, 279.9 ± 95.7 N; and sham group, 231.6 ± 50.6 N; P = .70), maximum yield load (PE group, 310.1 ± 166.1 N; UHMWPE group, 334.6 ± 95.2 N; and sham group, 290.9 ± 42.3 N; P = .84), linear stiffness (PE group, 43.3 ± 16.5 N/mm; UHMWPE group, 52.0 ± 28.2 N/mm; and sham group, 44.7 ± 7.2 N/mm; P = .66), and elongation at failure (PE group, 9.4 ± 4.3 mm; UHMWPE group, 9.1 ± 2.7 mm; and sham group, 10.1 ± 2.1 mm; P = .89) (Table 1).

      Observation of Failure Mode at the Time of Tensile Testing

      As for failure modes in tensile testing, femoral attachment avulsion was observed in 7 of 8 specimens in the PE group, 3 of 8 in the UHMWPE group, and 3 of 4 in the sham group (Fig 5A ). Midsubstance tears were observed in 1 of 8 specimens in the PE group and 3 of 8 in the UHMWPE group (Fig 5B). Tibial attachment avulsions were observed in 2 of 8 specimens in the UHMWPE group and 1 of 4 in the sham group (Fig 5C). No significant difference was found between the groups (P = .21) (Table 2).
      Figure thumbnail gr5
      Fig 5Failure modes at the time of tensile testing. (A) Avulsion from femoral attachment. (B) Midsubstance tear. (C) Avulsions from the tibial attachment. Yellow arrows indicate torn lesions in the superficial medial collateral ligament.
      Table 2Failure Modes Among the Groups
      Failure modePE (n = 8)UHMWPE (n = 8)Sham (n = 4)P Value
      Avulsion from the femoral attachment734.21
      Midsubstance tear130
      Avulsion from the tibial attachment020
      PE, polyester tape; UHMPE, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene.

      Histologic Evaluation

      Femoral attachment avulsion occurred between the calcified fibrocartilage layer and the laminar bone (Fig 6A ). Femoral attachment-site avulsion specimens showed longitudinally oriented collagen fibers, and many spindle-shaped cells were scattered in the proximal area of the repaired sMCL (Fig 6B). Spherical- rather than spindle-shaped cells were found in the core of the repaired sMCL, with small acellular areas in both the PE group and the UHMWPE group (Fig 6C). The midsubstance tear specimens showed no longitudinally oriented collagen fibers and many spherical cells were scattered (Fig 6D). In the tibial attachment site avulsion specimen, collagen fibers were longitudinally oriented, with numerous scattered spindle-shaped cells and scattered spherical cells (Fig 6E).
      Figure thumbnail gr6
      Fig 6Histologic evaluations. (A) Toluidine blue staining ×100; histologic observations of the UHMWPE group specimen, which avulsed from the femoral attachment. This specimen showed the detachment between the SB and CF at the femoral attachment. (B) Femoral attachment site avulsion specimen. It showed longitudinally oriented collagen fibers and spindle-shaped cells in the proximal area of the repaired sMCL. (C) In the core of the repaired sMCL, spherical rather than spindle-shaped cells were observed. (D) Midsubstance tear specimens showed no longitudinally oriented collagen fibers and many scattered spherical cells. (E) In the tibial attachment site avulsion specimen, collagen fibers were longitudinally oriented, with numerous scattered spindle-shaped cells and scattered spherical cells. (CF, calcified fibrocartilage; LI, ligament; SB, subchondral bone; sMCL, superficial medial collateral ligament; UF, uncalcified fibrocartilage; UHMWE, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene.)

      Discussion

      In this study, we clarified that the biomechanical properties of the native sMCL repaired by augmentation did not vary depending on the material properties of the suture augmentation used. In addition, the biomechanical properties of the repaired native sMCL were comparable with those of the normal sMCL. These results indicate that suture augmentation restores the innate biomechanical properties of sMCL independent of the material used for augmentation and affirm the repair of sMCL with suture augmentation. Results of this study provide valuable information regarding the efficacy of suture augmentation repair regardless of the materials used.
      Suture augmentation has been used for elbow and ankle ligament repair as a reinforcement method that allows safe and early return to sports after surgery.
      • Uchida S.
      • Kazuha K.
      • Utsunomiya H.
      • Yamanaka Y.
      • Sakai A.
      Elbow ulnar collateral ligament shoelace repair with internal bracing for treating throwing athletes who have ulnar collateral ligament instability.
      ,
      • Wittig U.
      • Hohenberger G.
      • Ornig M.
      • et al.
      Improved outcome and earlier return to activity after suture tape augmentation versus brostrom repair for chronic lateral ankle instability? A systematic review.
      In terms of suture augmentation for knee ligament injuries, suture augmentation associated with ACL reconstruction was discontinued as the result of increased foreign body reactions and rupture of the artificial ligament
      • Asahina S.
      • Yamamoto H.
      • Muneta T.
      • Ishibashi T.
      • Furuya K.
      Evaluation of anterior cruciate reconstruction reinforced by the Kennedy ligament augmentation device. An arthroscopic and histological study.
      • Olson E.J.
      • Kang J.D.
      • Fu F.H.
      • Georgescu H.I.
      • Mason G.C.
      • Evans C.H.
      The biochemical and histological effects of artificial ligament wear particles: In vitro and in vivo studies.
      • Struewer J.
      • Ziring E.
      • Ishaque B.
      • et al.
      Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical results after polyethylene terephthalate augmented anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
      ; however, recently, suture augmentation using UHMWPE tape has been reported to have good results.
      • Bodendorfer B.M.
      • Michaelson E.M.
      • Shu H.T.
      • et al.
      Suture augmented versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A matched comparative analysis.
      ,
      • Parkes C.W.
      • Leland D.P.
      • Levy B.A.
      • et al.
      Hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an all-inside technique with and without independent suture tape reinforcement.
      The anatomic reconstruction of the sMCL using autografts may be beneficial but may cause lesions at the donor site or interfere with other grafts or drilling tunnels when combined with other ligament reconstructions. Therefore, the primary repair of the sMCL may be necessary for acute multiligamentous injuries. In a comparison of repair alone, repair with augmentation, and reconstruction with allograft of MCL injuries, it has been reported that repair alone has significantly inferior biomechanical properties.
      • Gilmer B.B.
      • Crall T.
      • DeLong J.
      • Kubo T.
      • Mackay G.
      • Jani S.S.
      Biomechanical analysis of internal bracing for treatment of medial knee injuries.
      Other studies have shown that the biomechanical properties of augmentation anatomic repair are superior to repair alone and similar to the intact state.
      • Mehl J.T.
      • Kia C.
      • Murphy M.
      • et al.
      Posteromedial ligament repair of the knee with suture tape augmentation: A biomechanical study.
      ,
      • Gilmer B.B.
      • Crall T.
      • DeLong J.
      • Kubo T.
      • Mackay G.
      • Jani S.S.
      Biomechanical analysis of internal bracing for treatment of medial knee injuries.
      ,
      • Wijdicks C.A.
      • Michalski M.P.
      • Rasmussen M.T.
      • et al.
      Superficial medial collateral ligament anatomic augmented repair versus anatomic reconstruction: An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
      However, these studies only described the time-zero condition.
      Although suture augmentation raises concerns about tendon parenchymal deterioration due to stress shielding,
      • Majima T.
      • Yasuda K.
      • Tsuchida T.
      • et al.
      Stress shielding of patellar tendon: effect on small-diameter collagen fibrils in a rabbit model.
      Iwaasa et al.
      • Iwaasa T.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Tensho K.
      • Koyama S.
      • Takeshita K.
      • Takahashi J.
      Suture augmentation does not change biomechanical properties and histological remodeling of tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A study in a porcine model.
      reported that suture augmentation of ACL reconstruction in a porcine model did not worsen the biomechanical properties of the graft or affect its initial ligament remodeling or induce adverse reaction.
      In this study, UHMWPE and PE suture tapes were used for augmentation sMCL repair to determine whether the material difference affected the postoperative biomechanical properties. The use of UHMWPE showed high maximal load in the ACL avulsion fracture model.
      • Kubo T.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Biomechanical comparisons of anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture fixation using high-strength suture and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene suture tape in a porcine model.
      Because of its high biocompatibility,
      • Mackenzie C.E.A.
      • Huntington L.S.
      • Tulloch S.
      Suture tape augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases biomechanical stability: A scoping review of biomechanical, animal, and clinical studies.
      we hypothesized that the biomechanical properties of sMCLs repaired with UHMWPE suture tape augmentation would be superior to PE suture tape augmentation. However, the results of this study did not support this hypothesis. The material properties of the suture augmentation did not affect length changes after cyclic loading, postoperative structural properties, and failure modes and recovered without significant differences from the native control sMCL group. These results indicated that stress shielding, which may worsen the postoperative structural properties of the repair ligament,
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      ,
      • Majima T.
      • Yasuda K.
      • Tsuchida T.
      • et al.
      Stress shielding of patellar tendon: effect on small-diameter collagen fibrils in a rabbit model.
      did not occur in this model. On the contrary, the protective effect by the suture augmentation
      • Seitz H.
      • Pichl W.
      • Matzi V.
      • Nau T.
      Biomechanical evaluation of augmented and nonaugmented primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: An in vivo animal study.
      might contribute to sufficient recovery. The difference between the previous study
      • Takahashi T.
      • Kubo T.
      • Kimura M.
      • Takeshita K.
      Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
      and the present study appears to be in the fixation of the avulsed sMCL. The previous study used suture anchors for the fixation of the avulsed sMCL. This fixation method was reported to be noninferior to the native sMCL with respect to biomechanical properties at 4 weeks postoperatively.
      • Takahashi T.
      • Takeshita K.
      In vivo biomechanical evaluations of suture anchors for repairing grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament injury in a porcine model.
      On the contrary, in the present study, sMCL repair was performed using 2.0 nylon thread. This difference may influence the postoperative biomechanical properties after augmented sMCL repair, and the results of the present study indicated that this technique enabled sufficient recovery without additional implant costs for suture anchors. Further studies should validate the findings and further investigate the efficacy of augmented sMCL repair, including clinical trials of this surgical procedure.

      Limitations

      This study has several limitations. First, because this study used the porcine model, it could not be compared with a negative control group with conservative treatment requiring splint fixation. Second, the porcine was kept in cages of limited size, which may not have generated sufficient stress on the repaired sMCL. Third, femoral sMCL avulsion was made sharply using a scalpel at the femoral attachment, and this injury is not the same as that caused by a valgus traction force, which is frequently observed clinically. The forces involved in sMCL tearing may change the properties of the torn ligaments. Forth, the limited number of specimens and implants available reduced the number of samples available for each group. Therefore, an a priori power analysis was not performed. Fifth, although 4 weeks was a relatively short period of time, it was considered long enough to achieve adequate recovery for the reasons stated previously.

      Conclusions

      The material properties of suture augmentation used for sMCL repair did not significantly influence length changes during cyclic loading, postoperative structural properties, or failure modes.

      Acknowledgments

      We thank the staff members in Center for Development of Advanced Medical Technology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University for technical support for our animal experiments. We thank the staff of the Hirota Institute of Surgical Pathology for their support in preparing the tissue specimens. We also thank Bahaa Seedhom, Ph.D., for insightful advice for our biomechanical experiments.

      Supplementary Data

      References

        • Reider B.
        • Sathy M.R.
        • Talkington J.
        • Blyznak N.
        • Kollias S.
        Treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament injuries in athletes with early functional rehabilitation. A five-year follow-up study.
        Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22: 470-477
        • Indelicato P.A.
        Non-operative treatment of complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 323-329
        • Bollen S.
        Epidemiology of knee injuries: Diagnosis and triage.
        Br J Sports Med. 2000; 34: 227-228
        • Fetto J.F.
        • Marshall J.L.
        Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee: A rationale for treatment.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978; : 206-218
        • Stannard J.P.
        • Black B.S.
        • Azbell C.
        • Volgas D.A.
        Posteromedial corner injury in knee dislocations.
        J Knee Surg. 2012; 25: 429-434
        • Mehl J.T.
        • Kia C.
        • Murphy M.
        • et al.
        Posteromedial ligament repair of the knee with suture tape augmentation: A biomechanical study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 2952-2959
        • DeLong J.M.
        • Waterman B.R.
        Surgical repair of medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner injuries of the knee: A systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2249-2255.e2245
        • Gilmer B.B.
        • Crall T.
        • DeLong J.
        • Kubo T.
        • Mackay G.
        • Jani S.S.
        Biomechanical analysis of internal bracing for treatment of medial knee injuries.
        Orthopedics. 2016; 39: e532-e537
        • Takahashi T.
        • Kubo T.
        • Kimura M.
        • Takeshita K.
        Internal bracing with an artificial ligament for superficial medial collateral ligament injury impairs the mechanical property of repaired native ligament: A porcine study.
        J Orthop Sci. 2021; 26: 915-918
        • Lubowitz J.H.
        • MacKay G.
        • Gilmer B.
        Knee medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner anatomic repair with internal bracing.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2014; 3: e505-e508
        • Lee P.Y.F.
        • Golding D.
        • Rozewicz S.
        • Chandratreya A.
        Modern synthetic material is a safe and effective alternative for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26: 2716-2721
        • Mackenzie C.E.A.
        • Huntington L.S.
        • Tulloch S.
        Suture tape augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases biomechanical stability: A scoping review of biomechanical, animal, and clinical studies.
        Arthroscopy. 2022; 38: 2073-2089
        • Takahashi T.
        • Takeshita K.
        In vivo biomechanical evaluations of suture anchors for repairing grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament injury in a porcine model.
        J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021; 2923094990211021536
        • Kubo T.
        • Takahashi T.
        • Kimura M.
        • Takeshita K.
        Biomechanical comparisons of anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture fixation using high-strength suture and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene suture tape in a porcine model.
        J Knee Surg. 2022; 35: 1199-1203
        • Faul F.
        • Erdfelder E.
        • Lang A.G.
        • Buchner A.G.
        ∗Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
        Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191
        • Kanda Y.
        Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics.
        Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48: 452-458
        • Uchida S.
        • Kazuha K.
        • Utsunomiya H.
        • Yamanaka Y.
        • Sakai A.
        Elbow ulnar collateral ligament shoelace repair with internal bracing for treating throwing athletes who have ulnar collateral ligament instability.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2021; 10: e1873-e1878
        • Wittig U.
        • Hohenberger G.
        • Ornig M.
        • et al.
        Improved outcome and earlier return to activity after suture tape augmentation versus brostrom repair for chronic lateral ankle instability? A systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2022; 38: 597-608
        • Asahina S.
        • Yamamoto H.
        • Muneta T.
        • Ishibashi T.
        • Furuya K.
        Evaluation of anterior cruciate reconstruction reinforced by the Kennedy ligament augmentation device. An arthroscopic and histological study.
        Int Orthop. 1995; 19: 229-233
        • Olson E.J.
        • Kang J.D.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Georgescu H.I.
        • Mason G.C.
        • Evans C.H.
        The biochemical and histological effects of artificial ligament wear particles: In vitro and in vivo studies.
        Am J Sports Med. 1988; 16: 558-570
        • Struewer J.
        • Ziring E.
        • Ishaque B.
        • et al.
        Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical results after polyethylene terephthalate augmented anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Int Orthop. 2013; 37: 327-335
        • Bodendorfer B.M.
        • Michaelson E.M.
        • Shu H.T.
        • et al.
        Suture augmented versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A matched comparative analysis.
        Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 2114-2122
        • Parkes C.W.
        • Leland D.P.
        • Levy B.A.
        • et al.
        Hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an all-inside technique with and without independent suture tape reinforcement.
        Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 609-616
        • Wijdicks C.A.
        • Michalski M.P.
        • Rasmussen M.T.
        • et al.
        Superficial medial collateral ligament anatomic augmented repair versus anatomic reconstruction: An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2858-2866
        • Majima T.
        • Yasuda K.
        • Tsuchida T.
        • et al.
        Stress shielding of patellar tendon: effect on small-diameter collagen fibrils in a rabbit model.
        J Orthop Sci. 2003; 8: 836-841
        • Iwaasa T.
        • Takahashi T.
        • Tensho K.
        • Koyama S.
        • Takeshita K.
        • Takahashi J.
        Suture augmentation does not change biomechanical properties and histological remodeling of tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A study in a porcine model.
        Arthroscopy. 2023; 39: 1014-1024
        • Seitz H.
        • Pichl W.
        • Matzi V.
        • Nau T.
        Biomechanical evaluation of augmented and nonaugmented primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: An in vivo animal study.
        Int. Orthop. 2013; 37: 2305-2311