Pursuing subspecialty fellowship training following orthopaedic surgery residency is increasingly common. From 2003 to 2013, the percentage of fellowship applicants increased from 76% to 90%.
1- Horst P.K.
- Choo K.
- Bharucha N.
- Vail T.P.
Graduates of orthopaedic residency training are increasingly subspecialized: A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery part II database.
Orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships are particularly competitive. In a recent study, Mulcahey et al.
2- Mulcahey M.K.
- Hayes M.K.
- Smith C.M.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- Trojan J.D.
- McCarty E.C.
Outcomes in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Match, 2010-2017.
found that in the period from 2010 to 2017, the number of sports medicine fellowship applicants exceeded the number of positions available in every year except one. This is in comparison with a 2014 study, in which Daniels et al.
3- Daniels A.H.
- Grabel Z.
- DiGiovanni C.W.
ACGME Accreditation of orthopaedic surgery subspecialty fellowship training programs.
found that, overall, the 9 orthopaedic subspecialties had more positions than applicants.
Previous research has identified the factors considered to be most important among programs when ranking fellowship applicants. In a study of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship interview days, Haislup et al.
4- Haislup B.D.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- Baweja R.
- McCarty E.C.
- Mulcahey M.K.
Orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship interviews: Structure and organization of the interview day.
determined that the quality of the applicant interview was most significant to program directors when ranking applicants. Similarly, Baweja et al.
5- Baweja R.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- Mulcahey M.K.
- McCarty E.C.
Determining the most important factors involved in ranking orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship applicants.
found that the applicant’s residency program and personal connections were ranked among the top 5 most important factors. However, it is unclear how important these personal connections are in determining match success.
The term “pipeline” is commonly used to refer to programs that are designed to increase diversity and cultural competency in the workforce.
6- Kim Y.
- Kassam A.F.
- McElroy I.E.
- et al.
The current status of the diversity pipeline in surgical training.
,7- Mulcahey M.K.
- Van Heest A.E.
- Weber K.
Women in orthopaedics: How understanding implicit bias can help your practice.
However, this term may also pertain to the phenomenon that applicants from certain residency programs frequently match at the same fellowship programs. However, little is known about pipelining and its presence in the fellowship application process. The purpose of this study was to determine which residency programs the fellows of the top 10 orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs attended and whether residents are selected from the same residency programs multiple years. We hypothesized that fellows commonly would be selected from the same residency programs in multiple years.
Discussion
In this study, we found varying practices of applicants from the same residency programs matching at the same top orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs in multiple years. Evidence of pipelining was identified in 5 of the 7 programs evaluated, with pipelining ratios of 1.9, 1.5 (2 programs), and 1.4 (2 programs). This may negatively impact the match success rate among applicants from other residency programs without strong connections to a particular fellowship program.
Pipelining may refer to a positive strategy to increase diversity in certain fields. For example, Parsons et al.
9- Parsons M.
- Caldwell M.T.
- Alvarez A.
- et al.
Physician pipeline and pathway programs: An Evidence-based guide to best practices for diversity, equity, and inclusion from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.
referred to diversity in medicine as an “academic imperative,” especially as an important method for improving patient experiences and outcomes. This attitude is widely shared, and VanInwegen et al.
10- VanInwegen A.
- Caldas L.M.
- Ballentine R.
- et al.
An intensive summer pipeline program for pre-pharmacy students to increase underrepresented minority matriculation to pharmacy school.
described the efforts of a pipeline program at Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy to increase matriculation of students from underrepresented backgrounds. According to McNeill et al.,
11- McNeill I.T.
- Carrasquilla A.
- Asfaw Z.K.
- et al.
Breaking boundaries through Doctors Reaching Minority Men Exploring Neuroscience: A mentorship model to foster a pipeline for underrepresented minorities [published online July 1, 2022].
these programs may be significant in mitigating racial disparities in medicine. Pipelining, used in this context, is essential to the future of medicine and quality of patient care. In contrast, pipelining among orthopaedic fellowship programs may limit opportunities for qualified applicants and may actually go against the traditional goal of pipelining.
Given the competitiveness of matching into a sports medicine fellowship, the application process is complicated and tolling on the applicant. A 2021 study examining the process from the applicant’s perspective, based on orthopaedic surgery residents applying to sports medicine fellowships in 2016 and 2017, found that the majority of applicants (64.0%) applied to more than 20 programs, with most applicants (33.1%) spending $4,001 to $6,000 on interview expenses.
12- Zeoli T.
- Ashton M.L.
- Brown S.M.
- McCarty E.
- Mulcahey M.K.
The orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship application process: An analysis of the applicant experience.
The most important factors influencing an applicant’s impression of the program were interactions with faculty during interview day, case volume, and complexity.
12- Zeoli T.
- Ashton M.L.
- Brown S.M.
- McCarty E.
- Mulcahey M.K.
The orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship application process: An analysis of the applicant experience.
Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the interview process was held virtually during the last 2 application cycles. This eliminated the financial burden and allowed applicants to attend more interviews. According to a recent Letter to the Editor on the virtual interview process, not only were both time and money saved, but the time lost from residency training was dramatically reduced.
13An applicant's review of virtual fellowship interviews: The new norm?.
The author felt no misgivings when ranking programs and advised consideration of these benefits for future interview seasons.
13An applicant's review of virtual fellowship interviews: The new norm?.
However, losing the in-person aspect of the interview makes it more difficult to ascertain personalities and “feel” of a program.
14- Clark S.C.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- McCarty E.C.
- Mulcahey M.K.
Virtual interviews for sports medicine fellowship positions save time and money but don’t replace in-person meetings.
,15- Peebles L.A.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- Waterman B.R.
- Sherman S.L.
- Mulcahey M.K.
The Impact of COVID-19 on the orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship application process.
Previous studies indicated that for both applicants and program directors, the interview was one of the most important factors influencing their rank lists.
4- Haislup B.D.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- Baweja R.
- McCarty E.C.
- Mulcahey M.K.
Orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship interviews: Structure and organization of the interview day.
,12- Zeoli T.
- Ashton M.L.
- Brown S.M.
- McCarty E.
- Mulcahey M.K.
The orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship application process: An analysis of the applicant experience.
In a recent study by Clark et al.,
14- Clark S.C.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- McCarty E.C.
- Mulcahey M.K.
Virtual interviews for sports medicine fellowship positions save time and money but don’t replace in-person meetings.
the majority of program directors (75%) and applicants (68%) thought it was important/very important to interview in-person, to meet faculty members in-person (85% and 67%, respectively), and for applicants to tour the facilities in-person (80% and 67%, respectively). In addition, 58% of program directors agreed/strongly agreed that the virtual interview process negatively impacted their personal connection with the applicant.
14- Clark S.C.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- McCarty E.C.
- Mulcahey M.K.
Virtual interviews for sports medicine fellowship positions save time and money but don’t replace in-person meetings.
According to Peebles et al.,
15- Peebles L.A.
- Kraeutler M.J.
- Waterman B.R.
- Sherman S.L.
- Mulcahey M.K.
The Impact of COVID-19 on the orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship application process.
this is a cause for concern, as sports medicine fellowship directors may shift their emphasis to “word-of-mouth references,” personal connections to the fellows or faculty, or residency programs. This would put applicants who lack these connections at a disadvantage, despite being potentially exemplary candidates.
Overall, the practice of pipelining as well as using word-of-mouth references are advantages based on an applicant’s orthopaedic surgery residency program. This supports the idea of being “pigeonholed” into a certain tier of fellowship or geographic location, guided primarily by the residency program. For example, attending a residency program in the Northeast that doesn’t typically match residents to fellowship programs in the Southwest puts those applicants at a disadvantage. The same concept applies to residents attending programs that lack a history of sending residents to top fellowship programs. The ramifications of this include inequitable bias, as the applicant’s residency program may take priority over the remainder of the application in the eyes of fellowship programs, leading to inequitable outcomes for the applicants.
It is important for future studies to seek to find ways to reduce the practice of pipelining at orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs. This may include blinding the residency programs of applicants during the initial submission process, or blinding the names of attendings submitting letters of recommendation. However, neither of these ideas is perfect and can be easily circumvented. Thus, the most effective method of improving this process, however, is for fellowship faculty members to make a concerted effort to evaluate prospective fellows based on the applicants themselves rather than personal connections made through the applicant.
Limitations
The limitations of the study should be noted. This study was limited to the top 10 orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs as perceived by applicants,
8Geraghty EH, Kraeutler MJ, Clark SC, McCarty EC, Mulcahey MK. Program and faculty reputation are valued most by applicants to orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships [published online December 14, 2022]. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2022.10.014
and therefore it is unknown whether pipelining is an issue at other fellowship programs. Data could not be obtained from 3 of the 10 programs included in this study. The study duration differed among the programs based on the data that was available. Finally, the specific reasons for a high pipelining ratio at some programs could not be ascertained.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 18, 2023
Accepted:
January 5,
2023
Received:
September 16,
2022
Footnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: M.K.M. reports paid consultant; paid presenter or speaker, Arthrex; board or committee member, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy Association of North America, International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery, and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society, and The Forum; and editorial or governing board, American Journal of Sports Medicine Electronic Media, Arthroscopy, and Ortho Info. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.